Skip to content
Product Comparison

How to Make Money in Stocks vs Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets

GlowScience HQ may earn commission from links on this page. We never accept payment in exchange for positive reviews. How we test →

How to Make Money in Stocks

VS

Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets

Winner: Tie - Both are great choices

Choosing between How to Make Money in Stocks by William O'Neil and Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets by John Murphy is choosing between a complete trading system and a complete textbook. O'Neil gives you one specific, opinionated method (CANSLIM) you can act on immediately. Murphy gives you the broad, neutral foundation of technical analysis across markets without prescribing a single system. If you want a defined approach to start using now, read O'Neil. If you want the toolkit to understand any chart-based method, read Murphy.

FactorHow to Make Money in StocksTechnical Analysis of Financial Markets
Best forA specific actionable systemBroad technical foundation
ScopeGrowth-stock CANSLIM methodAll TA concepts, all markets
StylePrescriptiveReference textbook
OutcomeA rule set to followA toolkit to build from
Price tierBudgetBudget

How to Make Money in Stocks deep dive. O'Neil's strength is decisiveness. CANSLIM is a defined screen-and-rule framework covering earnings strength, leadership, institutional support, and market direction, plus strict loss-cutting rules. A new trader gets something concrete to execute and test rather than vague principles. Its weakness is that it is one philosophy (momentum growth investing) and will not suit value or income approaches, and it works best in particular market regimes. It is ideal for someone who wants a coherent system they can apply and evaluate immediately.

Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets deep dive. Murphy's strength is comprehensiveness and neutrality. It is the standard textbook on trend, support and resistance, chart patterns, indicators, intermarket relationships, and more, applicable to stocks, futures, and forex. Master it and you can understand and critique almost any technical method, including O'Neil's. Its limitation is that it hands you a toolbox, not a finished strategy; you still must assemble an approach. It is best for traders who want durable, transferable foundations rather than a single recipe.

Head to head. O'Neil answers "what exactly should I do?"; Murphy answers "how does chart-based analysis work in general?". A trader with only O'Neil has a system but limited ability to adapt when it stops working. A trader with only Murphy understands the field but may stall without a concrete plan. They pair well: learn the foundation from Murphy, adopt or adapt a defined system like O'Neil's.

Our pick: it depends on what you want. Want to start trading a defined method this month: O'Neil. Want a lasting technical foundation that makes every other strategy book easier: Murphy. Many traders read O'Neil first for momentum, then Murphy for the deeper why.

FAQ

Is CANSLIM still valid? The principles (earnings strength, leadership, risk control) remain widely used; like any momentum system it performs better in trending markets and worse in choppy ones, which is exactly why understanding broader TA helps.

Do I need both? Not strictly. One actionable system or one strong foundation can be enough to start; serious traders usually want both.

More Comparisons